|
![](/i/fill.gif) |
In article <40254abd$1@news.povray.org>, "St." <dot### [at] dot com> wrote:
> "Kurts" <kur### [at] yahoo fr> wrote in message
> news:kurtzlepirate-6C6C57.20143307022004@news.povray.org...
> > In article <ide### [at] econym demon co uk>,
>
> > it works !!!!!!!
>
> ....and if you change lines 0, 1, 3, 4, to;
>
> #declare MySplinePoints[0] =<-3.845, 3, 0.28>;
> #declare MySplinePoints[1] =< -.12, 2, 0.01>;
> #declare MySplinePoints[3] =< 4.1, 3, 0>;
> #declare MySplinePoints[4] =< 5.01, 4, 3.88>;
>
> ...gets rid of the problem on the left, (there was still a problem
> there), but leaves a *very* small problem in the middle of the nearest
> piece of chain. (Probably unnoticeable when scaled down and used in an
> image of course).
>
> That's about the closest I can get.
>
> ~Steve~
>
i not see any problem on the left side. your 0, 1, 3 et 4 modifications points
change the spline at the right. here is a composite image with and without this
points modified.
Post a reply to this message
Attachments:
Download 'difference.jpg' (12 KB)
Preview of image 'difference.jpg'
![difference.jpg](/povray.binaries.images/attachment/%3Ckurtzlepirate-0EA0A5.23310007022004%40news.povray.org%3E/difference.jpg?preview=1)
|
![](/i/fill.gif) |